ROLE OF MEDIA IN CRIMINAL CASE: BANGLADESH PERSPECTIVE
Abstract
Over
the last one and half decades, media have been receiving increasing amount of
attention as an ‘alternate watchdog’ that often get more public attention than
the audit community, transparency, anti-corruption bodies and think tanks in
addressing public corruption. The media is interested in ‘horror stories’
uncovered through investigative journalism – which have great ‘media value’ in
combating corruption. Along with the global trend it is timely and appropriate
to trace what impact media have been bringing on fiscal transparency and
accountability of public sector corruption in Bangladesh.
This
is an exploratory study with a combination of quantitative and qualitative
method applied for the collection of data through questionnaire survey,
interviews, case studies and content analysis. The study shows that
historically media could not play a noticeable role in combating public sector
corruption although the first effort of press establishment was linked to
disclose the corruption of colonial administration. Strict control pursued by
the colonial administration seriously undermined media’s freedom to address
corruption. Besides, denial of information, financial limitation and low
literacy rate also affected media’s function. Nevertheless, with the changes of
time media are playing a significant role in addressing corruption issues,
especially after the restoration of parliamentary democracy in 1991.
The
overall position of ‘media freedom’ in Bangladesh is satisfactory, but its
influence is relatively low in fighting corruption. Despite good ‘reporting
incident’, ‘reporting quality, remained poor and most reports can not touch the
upper stratum of public corruption. Finally, in comparison to electronic media,
print media is performing better in combating public sector corruption.
CONTENTS
DESCRIPTIONS
|
Page
No.
|
||
Chapter
1: Introduction
|
|
||
1.1
|
Introduction
|
01
|
|
1.2
|
Background
|
02
|
|
1.3
|
Statement of
the problem
|
03
|
|
1.4
|
Significance of the research
problem
|
04
|
|
1.5
|
Research
question
|
04
|
|
1.6
|
Scope and objective
|
04
|
|
1.7
|
The objectives
|
05
|
|
1.8
|
Methodology
|
05
|
|
Chapter
2: Theoretical Discussion
|
|
||
2.1
|
Introduction
|
07
|
|
2.2
|
Literature
Review
|
07
|
|
2.3
|
Relevant Theories
|
11
|
|
2.4
|
Analytical
Framework
|
12
|
|
2.4.1
Dependent variable
|
12
|
||
2.4.2
Independent variable
|
13
|
||
Chapter
3: Historical Background of Media Role
|
|
||
3.1
|
Introduction
|
15
|
|
3.2
|
Earliest media exposition
|
15
|
|
3.3
|
Genesis of
media development
|
16
|
|
Chapter 4: Media
under Criminal Case In Bangladesh
Introduction
|
22
|
|
4.2
|
Media development under
democracy
|
22
|
4.3
|
Impact on
Criminal Case’s
|
24
|
4.4
|
Satisfaction with the overall
performance and impact of media
|
35
|
Chapter
5 Factors Affecting Role of Media
|
|
|
5.1
|
Introduction
|
37
|
5.2
|
Reporting
incident
|
37
|
5.3
|
Reporting quality
|
39
|
5.4
|
Media freedom
|
42
|
Chapter
6: Findings and Conclusion
|
|
|
6.1
|
Summary of
findings
|
45
|
6.2
|
Conclusion
|
47
|
References
|
49-50
|
LIST OF TABLES
|
Page No.
|
Table 2.1:
Indicators for the dependent variable
|
18
|
Table 2.2:
Indicators for the independent variables
|
19
|
Table 4.1:
List of electronic and print media in Bangladesh
|
35
|
Table 4.2:
Level of satisfaction on the performance and impact of media in
|
47
|
combating corruption
|
|
Table 4.3:
Descriptive statistics on satisfaction of media’s role on corruption
|
48
|
Table 5.1:
Descriptive statistics of reporting incident
|
49
|
Table 5.2:
Descriptive statistics of reporting standard
|
52
|
Table 5.3:
Journalist’s view on the threats/restriction involved in investigating
|
53
|
report
|
|
Table 5.4:
Descriptive statistics on the opinion of freedom about political and
|
56
|
bureaucratic corruption
|
|
Table 5.5:
Comparative statistics of freedom about political & bureaucratic
|
57
|
corruption
|
|
Table 5.6:
Grade of difficulty to get access to information on government
|
68
|
corruption
|
|
Table 5.7:
Perception about the professional and ethical standard of journalist
|
74
|
Table 5.8:
People perception about ‘corruption within media stands as barrier in
|
82
|
combating corruption’
|
|
Table 5.9:
Opinions on many media/journalists pursue their own agenda
|
83
|
Table 5.10:
Trust level of general respondent about the objectivity of report
|
83
|
Table 5.11:
Mean Index of dependent and independent variables
|
84
|
Table 5.12:
Correlation of independent variables with dependent variable
|
85
|
|
|
|
Page
No.
|
|
|
Figure 2.1:
Analytical Framework for measuring the role of media in combating
|
17
|
public
corruption
|
|
Figure 4.1:
Perception on the tangible impact of media reporting on corruption
|
37
|
(n=70)
|
|
Figure 4.2:
Frequency of various tangible impacts opined by respondents (n=51)
|
38
|
Figure 4.3:
Perception on intangible impact of media reporting on corruption
|
43
|
(n=70)
|
|
Figure 4.4:
Frequency of various intangible impacts opined by respondents (n=56)
|
44
|
Figure 5.1:
Comparative opinions of incidents of reporting between electronic &
|
50
|
print media
|
|
Figure 5.2:
Opinions of journalist and general respondent on reporting nature
|
51
|
(n=70)
|
|
Figure 5.3:
Variations of the answers of print & electronic media respondents on
|
54
|
threat/pressure
involved in investigating reporting. (n=20+20=40)
|
|
Figure 5.4:
Reasons restrict freedom: Journalist opinion and people perception
|
58
|
(n=49)
|
|
Figure 5.5:
Comparative opinions of electronic and print media journalists on
|
62
|
restrictive
factors of freedom (n=27)
|
|
Figure 5.6:
Respondent’s opinion regarding legal factors in ensuring freedom
|
63
|
(n=70)
|
|
Figure 5.7:
Experience of media respondents about harassment/punishment (n=40)
|
64
|
Figure 5.8:
Frequency of journalists harassed by various actors (n=17)
|
65
|
Figure 5.9:
Opinion about impunity as a serious threat to combat corruption
|
66
|
|
|
Figure 5.10:
Journalist’s opinion in facing difficulties on the collection of
|
69
|
information on
government corruption
|
|
Figure 5.11:
Whether existing relationship of media & bureaucracy is favorable to
|
71
|
combat corruption:
opinion of journalist and civil servant (n=40+12=52)
|
|
Figure 5.12:
Comparative opinions regarding the self-regulation for media
|
76
|
accountability
(n=70)
|
|
Figure 5.13:
Comparative views about impartial media report on corruption
|
77
|
(n=70)
|
|
Figure 5.14:
Corruption engulfing the media: opinion of media respondents
|
78
|
(n=40)
|
|
Figure 5.15:
Comparative opinions of electronic & print media journalist on
|
81
|
‘corruption
engulfing media.’ n= (20+20) =40
|
|
Figure 5.16:
Perception of general respondent about ‘journalists accept money
|
81
|
from source of
corruption.’
|
|
LIST OF BOXES
(Case Study)
|
|
|
Page No.
|
Case study
3.1: Stealing cow from officer mess
|
27
|
Case study
4.1: Doing business with government by breaching law
|
39
|
Case study 4.2:
Former Railway Minister’s resignation
|
41
|
Case study
4.3: RAB personnel fired on looted money
|
42
|
Case study
4.4: Milk seller’s story: Brother, now I add water in milk
|
79
|
ACC Anti-Corruption
Commission
AP Associated
Press
APS Assistant
Personal Secretary
BBC British
Broadcasting Corporation
BC Before
Christian
BGB Boarder Guard
of Bangladesh
BTV Bangladesh
Television
CEO Chief
Executive Officer
CMLA Chief Martial Law
Administrator
CPA Central Public
Administration
CPJ Committee to
Protect Journalists
EC Election
Commission
GOB Government of
Bangladesh
IPI International
Press Institute
JATRI Journalism
Training & Research Initiative
MCA Member of
Constitute Assembly
MOI Ministry of
Information
MW Mega Watt
NGO Non-Government
Organization
NSI National
Security Intelligence
PIB Press
Institute of Bangladesh
PC Press
Council
RAB Rapid Action
Battalion
RHD Roads and
Highway Department
RTI Right to
Information
SPJ Society of
Professional Journalists
SPSS Statistical
Package for the Social Sciences
STV Satellite
Television
TI Transparency
International
TIB Transparency
International Bangladesh
TAPEE Transparency,
Accountability, Prevention, Education and
Enforcement
TV Television
TVRO Television
Receive Only Dish
UNDP United Nation
Development Program
USAID United States
Agency for International Development
WB World Bank
Comments
Post a Comment