A CRITICAL STUDY ON ARREST AND REMAND SYSTEM IN BANGLADESH
Abstract
Arbitrary arrest, detention and custodial
torture by law-enforcing agencies have remained a persistent feature of our
criminal justice system. These practices have been widespread in Bangladesh
irrespective of the forms of government and successive governments have failed
to stop this endemic problem. Arbitrary arrest, detention and infliction of
torture are unacceptable in any form of government that is committed to
democracy and the rule of law. Despite the legal and constitutional provisions
against arbitrary arrest and detention, the practice of arbitrary arrest,
detention and torture is rampant in Bangladesh. Against this background, the
higher judiciary in Bangladesh has taken a proactive stand in prevention of
arbitrary arrest, detention and torture and delivered a number of guidelines in
some Public Interest Litigation (PIL) cases for initiating legal reform by the
government.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Supervision’s
Declaration
|
i
|
Letter Of Submission
|
ii
|
Student Declaration
|
iii
|
Acknowledgments
|
iv
|
Table of Contents
|
v
|
Abstract
|
vii
|
CHAPTER-01
INTRODUCTION
|
|
1.1 Introduction
|
|
1.2 Research Questions:
|
|
1.3 Research Objective:
|
|
1.4 Literature Review
|
|
1.5 Methodology of the study
|
|
Chapter- Two
DISCUSION OF THE REMAND AND ARREST
|
|
2.1 Definition of Arrest:
|
|
2.2 Definition of Remand
|
|
2.3 Nature of Arrest
|
|
2.4 Nature of Remand
|
|
Chapter 3
Existing Scenario of Arrest and Remand Enforcing Agency in
Bangladesh
|
|
3.1 International Restraints
|
|
3.2 Constitutional Restraints
|
|
3.3 National Laws Authorizing Arrest and Torture
|
|
Chapter
4
THE
BLAST CASE AND HIGH COURT’S VERDICT
|
|
4.1 The BLAST Judgment: Background
|
|
4.2 High Court’s
Order on Section 54 and Section 167 of Cr.P.C.
|
|
Chapter
5
SOME
RECENT CASES OF ARREST AND REMAND
|
|
5.1 Torture against Limon
Hossain
|
|
5.2 Torture against Abdul Kader
|
|
Chapter
6
RECOMMENDATIONS
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
Bibliography
|
|
Comments
Post a Comment